Agriculture MCQ Agriculture In 2014, Tyson Foods announced its intentions to purchase Hillshire Brands. This merger would imply that Tyson would be the sole buyer of more than 1/3 of all the sows purchased from U.S. farmers. One benefit to the consumer of this merger is that the larger Tyson may be able to:

In 2014, Tyson Foods announced its intentions to purchase Hillshire Brands. This merger would imply that Tyson would be the sole buyer of more than 1/3 of all the sows purchased from U.S. farmers. One benefit to the consumer of this merger is that the larger Tyson may be able to:

Naim 02:14 Agriculture

In 2014, Tyson Foods announced its intentions to purchase Hillshire Brands. This merger would imply that Tyson would be the sole buyer of more than 1/3 of all the sows purchased from U.S. farmers. One benefit to the consumer of this merger is that the larger Tyson may be able to:

a. Exercise market power
b. Increase market competition
c. Decrease its economies of scale
d. Decrease its per unit costs of production and processing

Answer: D

Learn More :

If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box. If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box.

Agriculture MCQ

In 2014, Tyson Foods announced its intentions to purchase Hillshire Brands. This merger would imply that Tyson would be the sole buyer of more than 1/3 of all the sows purchased from U.S. farmers. One benefit to the consumer of this merger is that the larger Tyson may be able to:

In 2014, Tyson Foods announced its intentions to purchase Hillshire Brands. This merger would imply that Tyson would be the sole buyer of more than 1/3 of all the sows purchased from U.S. farmers. One benefit to the consumer of this merger is that the larger Tyson may be able to:

Learn More :

Share this